OLATS TALAGA SI DIGONG DUTERTE! NAGKA-UTAL-UTAL KAY CONG JINKY LUISTRO!
00:25.7
former President Rodrigo Duterte on
00:27.5
Wednesday said he was asking the icc
00:30.2
Whose jurisdiction is Administration and
00:32.3
the current Marcus JR do not recognize
00:34.6
to rush its investigation into his drug
00:36.9
war on drugs over alleged crimes against
00:39.7
humanity I'm asking the icc to hurry up
00:43.1
and if possible they can come here and
00:45.6
start the investigation tomorrow Ayun
00:47.9
Actually Matagal naman ang
00:49.0
nag-iimbestiga ang icc may mga reports
00:51.8
na niyan last year pa ' ba Actually as
00:53.3
early as February of this year may mga
00:56.1
bali-balita na na nandito na iyung icc
00:58.5
Where's the delay coming from
01:00.6
Syempre mga kutchero Proceeding yan eh
01:02.9
legal Proceeding yan eh I would say
01:05.3
because of the non-participation of the
01:08.3
administration sabi pa ni degong Baka
01:10.7
raw pamatay na raw siya Hindi pa raw
01:12.2
tapos mag-imbestiga yung icc Alam niyo
01:14.5
again mga Kakero ah kung ano kung kilala
01:17.4
niyya na si digong and I'm sure kilalang
01:19.2
kilala niyya na si digong yabang lang na
01:21.3
yan Hindi ako naniniwala n gugustuhin ni
01:24.3
digong na maimbestigahan siya ng
01:27.9
icc dito sa ano sa latter part ng ano ng
01:32.6
kanyang buhay di mangyayari yun
01:36.1
Imposible yun drama lang niya yan yabang
01:38.8
lang ni yyan and he's hoping I'm
01:41.7
thinking He's hoping na yung mga dds
01:46.0
niya will be un papalakpakan siya ng mga
01:49.6
dds niya diyan sa publicity stun niya na
01:52.7
yan hindi niya gusto yan Natawa nga ako
01:55.4
sa kanya kanina ilang Bes niya
01:56.6
inulit-ulit eh um I hold myself legally
02:00.0
responsible for any legal and illegal
02:02.6
act committed during the drug war sinabi
02:05.2
niyo yun paulit-ulit pero Nung tinanong
02:07.8
siya ni Ano Dan Fernandez ni Cong
02:09.4
Fernandez Anong gagawin mo sa mga pulis
02:11.6
na nasira ang buhay dahil sumunod SAO
02:13.6
magpapa fund daw siya bubukas daw siya
02:15.9
ng fund para sa mga pulis na ito
02:18.5
Actually may mali din kasi doon sa
02:20.5
pagkaka ano ng tanong ni Cong Fernandez
02:23.9
he could have said So if you're holding
02:25.7
yourself legally responsible sa mga
02:28.2
pulis na to ba Ba't sila yung Hayaan mo
02:30.3
makulong Ba't hindi ikaw yung humarap
02:32.0
kung yun Sana ang tinanong ni ano kong
02:33.8
Dan Fernandez eh baka na-corner ulit si
02:36.3
digong baka Nagwawala na naman siya o
02:38.6
nagsisigaw na naman siya doon sasabihin
02:40.2
na naman niya kung ano-ano kasi maiipit
02:42.2
si digong doon eh if you're holding
02:43.8
yourself legally responsible for the all
02:46.4
the legal and illegal act Eh bakit ikaw
02:48.9
yung malaya at yung mga tao y nakakulong
02:51.2
yung mga pulis yung nakakulong biglang
02:53.2
sasabihin niya hindi guilt is personal
02:55.8
eh Hindi eh you also have the the
02:59.1
terminology we call command
03:01.8
responsibility sa hearing kanina yung
03:04.1
interpolation ni kong luistro tungkol d
03:06.6
sa conspiracy ay Saktong sakto yun doon
03:09.1
pakingan natin ha it is my humble
03:11.7
opinion that one will not take legal
03:16.1
responsibility unless there is no
03:18.2
willingness as well To admit being
03:21.2
behind all the killing incidents that
03:24.4
transpired during the war on drugs it is
03:27.5
therefore the humble subm
03:31.7
ch that with that statement coming from
03:35.1
the former President he acknowledges
03:37.8
that all the killing incidents during
03:40.4
the war on drugs spring from his order
03:47.4
personalities that is a manifestation Mr
03:50.5
chair Mr ch I understand that the
03:53.4
Resource speaker the former president is
03:55.7
a law Mr President May i requ that
04:00.3
the Filipino people and I am certain
04:02.9
that you understand what conspiracy
04:05.8
theory is all about please educate us Mr
04:10.8
Uh I may have some lapses already but Uh
04:15.8
I will give you the definition of Uh the
04:18.6
conspiracy to commit a crime when two or
04:21.4
more persons decide or discuss to commit
04:31.3
more or less ganon ang takbo ng ano
04:34.0
Thank you Mr President and you will
04:36.0
agree with me Mr President that under
04:38.8
the conspiracy theory Mayon pong tatlong
04:42.0
klase ng principal one is principal by
04:46.0
inducement two is principal by
04:48.9
indispensable cooperation and three
04:52.4
principal by direct participation being
04:55.6
a long time prosecutor Mr President Can
04:58.3
you please Enlighten us on
05:00.8
an inducement could be Uh money usually
05:06.2
or Uh inducement by a woman to a man to
05:12.5
kill her husband so that they can live
05:16.3
forever happily ever after Parang ang
05:19.5
complicated ng salitang inducement di ba
05:21.4
simple lang naman Iyun principal by
05:23.3
inducement ibig sabihin lang yan SAO n
05:25.7
galing yung benepisyo so sa conspiracy
05:27.9
you're the principal by inducement kung
05:30.0
SAO manggagaling yung reward or a
05:33.2
benefit ng co-conspirator mo halimbawa
05:35.7
dito sa war on drugs reward system yan
05:39.1
yun yun yun yung ano yun yung principle
05:41.3
by inducement ikaw yung gumawa ng
05:43.2
sistema ng reward system y yun ang
05:45.6
principal by inducement So you have
05:47.3
explained Mr President principal by
05:49.6
inducement it could be money It Could Be
05:52.7
An Order by a person who have influence
05:55.9
over another How about princip
05:60.0
participation Mr President you
06:06.1
Actually agree with one another to
06:09.7
commit a crime and you participate thank
06:12.4
you And how about principal by
06:16.9
cooperation Well in the sense that for
06:21.0
example If there is no way of traveling
06:25.0
from one place to another and you are
06:27.1
the only person who can provide
06:30.8
transportation vehicle and That be
06:33.9
indispensable cooperation Thank you Mr
06:36.6
President for enlightening us going back
06:39.6
to your statement that you are taking
06:42.2
full legal responsibility to all the
06:45.2
victims of War on drugs both legal and
06:49.4
illegal it is my humble submission Mr
06:53.5
chair that the former
06:56.5
President can be considered
06:59.8
liable for all this crimes under the
07:04.4
conspiracy by being a principal by
07:08.4
inj I wish to manifest Mr chair that
07:14.1
order without the
07:16.8
reward this police
07:19.5
operatives should not have resulted to
07:23.2
killing a huge number of victims of War
07:30.2
back to disagree with your prem ma I
07:33.4
understand Mr President but that is a
07:35.6
manifestation Yes but you know is
07:38.7
supposed to do his Duty he he goes to
07:42.2
school for two years He is receive
07:46.0
instructions to how to go about his
07:49.0
Duty and we have to give the presumption
07:56.8
regularity That's a principle
08:01.4
law Thank you Mr President every time na
08:04.6
may ginawa k in your favor is the
08:08.0
principle of regularity presumption
08:12.2
regularity of performance of official
08:14.8
Duty Mr President sa Criminal Law po
08:17.6
kasi di ba may mga iba't ibang klase ng
08:19.8
Uh circumstances may justifying
08:23.8
circumstances mitigating circumstances
08:26.2
etc etc maraming iba't ibang mga Ong mga
08:29.8
circumstances na to Ito yung mga events
08:31.9
kung saan ang ah kaso mo ay pwedeng
08:35.3
mapababa through mitigating circumstance
08:37.6
or ma-dismiss yung kaso mo as a
08:39.8
justifying circumstance ngayon yung
08:41.8
sinasabi po ni digong mga kero na
08:44.4
justifying circumstance of um the
08:47.1
performance of one's Duty ibig sabihin
08:49.7
dahil pulis ka dalawang taon nag-aral
08:52.5
yyung mga kapulisan ng ah ng kanilang
08:55.5
mga course para maging pulis and they
08:57.8
they are exercising ung kanilang ah
09:00.8
authority bilang pulis eh justified sila
09:04.3
Kaya nga sinabi niya ano eh Hindi ako
09:06.2
agree sa premise mo k Sabi niya kay
09:08.1
luistro pero kasi mga k kutchero ah and
09:11.5
again mga k kutsero hindi lang po self
09:13.2
defense ang isang justifying
09:14.3
circumstance pati yung um performance of
09:17.2
one's Duty So ibig sabihin kapag
09:19.0
nakapatay ka pero yung pagpatay mo Is In
09:22.1
the performance of one's Duty then It's
09:24.4
a justifying circumstance Okay lang yun
09:26.3
Kumbaga ang problema kasi doon mga
09:28.2
kutchero sa sinasabi ni digong Is You
09:30.5
have to prove that it is done in
09:33.2
performance of one's duty kailangan
09:36.0
patunayan mo na ginawahan mo yung
09:38.6
proseso yung presumption of regularity
09:41.2
po mga kutsero it's not automatic Hindi
09:43.7
ho porke may presumption of regularity
09:45.7
ibig sabihin eh tama na yung pagpatay No
09:49.0
it's not kailangan pa ho patunayan mo
09:55.0
circumstance behind the act paano
09:58.8
Papaano ka umabot sa ganong punto at
10:01.8
paano mapapatunayan na ginawa mo yung
10:04.8
Criminal Act in line with your Duty
10:08.3
Hindi ho basta-basta yun hindi pwede
10:10.2
Basta sabihin lang na hindi hindi pulis
10:11.9
ako So lahat ng ginagawa ko In Line of
10:13.6
my Duty No it's not
