* AI ("Artificial Intelligence") subtitles on Tagalog.com are generated using "Whisper" by OpenAI (the same company that created ChatGPT and DallE2). Results and accuracy may vary.
* The subtitles do include errors occasionally and should only be used as a tool to help with your listening practice.
* You can request this website to create a transcript for a video if one doesn't already exist by clicking the "Request AI Subtitles" button below a video. Transcribing usually takes 30-40% of the length of a video to complete if there are no other videos in
the queue. For example, a 21 minute video will take 7-8 minutes to transcribe.
* Running a super fast cloud GPU server to do these transcriptions does cost money. If you have the desire and financial ability, consider
becoming a patron
to support these video transcriptions, and the other tools and apps built by Tagalog.com
00:15.5
Good day po sa lahat This is fiscal EJ
00:17.9
once again As I said in my last video We
00:21.4
will discuss each of the concepts as to
00:23.8
Why criminal liability is individual and
00:26.6
cannot be transferred to another
00:29.0
person guilt is personal Sabi nga ni
00:32.1
former President Duterte hindi mo
00:35.0
pwedeng ipasa sa iba ang iyong
00:37.3
pagkakasala pwera na lang kung ang taong
00:39.8
iyon ay nakipagsabwatan SAO sa paggawa
00:44.2
krimen sa ilalim ng batas ang tawag po
00:50.3
conspiracy ano ba ang conspiracy under
00:54.0
article 8 of the revised Penal Code a
00:57.2
conspiracy exists when two or more
01:01.0
agre conc the Commission of fon and
01:04.7
decide to commit it sa Tagalog Ito ay
01:08.4
kasunduan o sabwatan ng dalawa o mahigit
01:11.8
sa dalawang tao sa paggawa ng isang
01:14.6
krimen sa ilalim ng batas dalawa ang
01:19.7
conspiracy conspiracy as a means of
01:22.3
inuring criminal liability and
01:25.1
conspiracy as a crime in
01:28.0
itself Let us discuss conspiracy as a
01:31.6
means of incurring criminal
01:34.2
liability when you say conspiracy as a
01:37.1
means of incurring criminal liability
01:40.3
hindi sapat ang kasunduan o sabwatan
01:43.2
lamang kailangan akw na gawin ang krimen
01:47.6
ayon sa napag-usapan o
01:50.6
napagkasunduan Let us go through some
01:53.4
examples example number one nagkasundo
01:57.6
sina a b at C na Papatayin nila si D sa
02:02.6
takdang araw nang dumating ang takdang
02:05.6
araw hindi sumipot si a si B at C lang
02:09.4
ang sumipot at pumatay kay d question
02:13.4
Sino ba ang liable si a b at c o si B at
02:18.6
C lamang the answer is si B at C lang
02:23.0
ang mananagot kahit na nakipagsabwatan
02:26.1
si a ang hindi niya pagsipot ay
02:29.0
pag-atras niya sa kasunduan o sa buatan
02:33.2
the Exception to this happens when si a
02:37.7
mastermind meaning siya ang nag-u
02:40.8
nagplano at nag-udyok kay B at C In
02:44.4
which case Kahit na hindi siya sumipot
02:47.0
sa takdang araw magiging liable pa rin
02:49.8
si a sa pagpatay kay
02:51.9
d example number two nagkasundo sina a b
02:57.0
at C na Papatayin nila si D sa takdang
03:00.8
araw nang dumating ang takdang araw
03:03.7
sumipot si a p at C pero si C lang ang
03:07.2
pumatay kay d si a at b ay nagsilbing
03:10.7
lookout lamang habang pinapatay ni C si
03:14.4
D question liable pa rin ba si A at B
03:19.1
Kahit na hindi Sila mismo ang pumatay
03:21.1
kay d the answer is Yes liable pa rin si
03:26.2
A at B Kahit na hindi Sila mismo ang
03:29.3
pumatay kay d masasabi nating tinulungan
03:32.8
pa rin nila si C sa pagpatay kay d in a
03:37.0
conspiracy the act of one is the act of
03:41.1
all example number three nagkasundo sina
03:45.0
a b at C na Papatayin nila si D sa
03:49.2
takdang araw nang dumating ang takdang
03:51.7
araw walang niisa sa kanila ang sumipot
03:55.2
para patayin si D question mananagot ba
03:59.4
si a b at C dahil nagkasundo silang
04:03.6
patayin si D the answer is no Wala pong
04:08.5
pananagutan si a b at C dahil ang isang
04:12.6
Mere conspiracy to commit murder is not
04:15.9
punishable under our Penal laws You
04:19.2
might ask eh fiscal ' ba Masama ang
04:23.2
makipagsabwatan na patayin ang isang tao
04:26.6
Yes masama it is reprehensible
04:30.3
but no matter how Evil it is if there is
04:33.6
no law punishing the act then it is not
04:37.4
crime remember this Latin Maxim nul
04:43.5
puen in English it means there is no
04:46.6
crime When There is no law punishing
04:50.3
it pero meron pong klase ng conspiracy
04:54.1
that is already considered a crime in
04:56.8
itself here the agre to commit the Crime
05:00.9
is already punishable In other words the
05:04.6
persons who agreed to commit the Crime
05:07.3
need not commit the Crime agreed upon
05:11.0
examples are number one conspiracy to
05:14.6
commit treason under article 115 of the
05:17.5
revised Penal Code number two conspiracy
05:21.0
to commit kudeta under article
05:23.5
136 number three conspiracy to commit
05:26.9
Rebellion or insurrection also under
05:30.4
136 and number conspiracy to commit
05:34.8
sed under article
05:39.3
1441 so Yan po ang konsepto ng
05:43.1
conspiracy in relation to the statement
05:47.2
guilt is personal so hanggang dito
05:50.6
naamang po tayo and see you in my next
